« Penfolds Super Premiums Released | Main | Wines recently reviewed in The Wine Front ... »

Vital research into smoke tainted wines

OVER THE past month or two I've tasted a number of Victorian wines from the 2007 vintage that have minor or significant degrees of bushfire smoke taint. In small doses it can be nicely complexing, while in more significant doses it can make for a wine that tastes downright disgusting. It also tends to change in the wine over time - in some cases getting worse, in others lessening. Many parts of Australia are at massive, annual risk of bushfire and Victoria alone is considered the most bushfire prone region in the world - so the effect of bushfire smoke on grapes and their resultant wine is a crucial issue. It was fantastic to therefore receive the following release from the King Valley Vignerons.

NEWS RELEASE

King Valley Vignerons, together with the Department of Primary Industry (DPI), Department of Sustainability and the Environment (DSE) and Environment Protection Authority are conducting research into the effect of smoke on grapes vines and grapes. King Valley Wine Region was severely affected by the smoke from the wild fires in the Alpine National Park in 2003 and 2006/07 and is observing with great interest the fuel reduction burns currently being conducted by DSE.

It is clear from previous experiences that severe intensity of smoke on vines results in fruit being affected, but there are a lot of unknown issues and it is these that are the focus of the current research. It has been determined that grapes do not absorb the smoke compounds directly. The chemicals are absorbed by the leaves and translocated to the berries. Part of the current research is focussing on this translocation process, as well as other issues such as the affects of varying levels of smoke intensity and hours of contact.

A number of King Valley growers have left significant quantities of grapes on vines so that sampling can be done over the next few weeks following the fuel reduction burns currently being conducted. A caravan containing sophisticated monitoring equipment has been provided by the EPA to measure the intensity and content of the smoke being produced. The results of this monitoring, together with berry, leaf and cane sampling and small lot wine making will all be studied by Dr Mark Downey of DPI.

Growers and DSE will be waiting eagerly for the results of the research. King Valley growers are supporters of DSE’s fuel reduction program, but certainly don’t want there to be any detrimental effects on their grapes. The difficulty is that DSE has a very small window of opportunity in which to conduct these control burns, and this is March and April, when the most grapes are almost ready for harvest. The results of this research will certainly help with planning of burns for the future.

-- ends --
 

Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 05:26PM by Registered Commentercampbell mattinson | Comments5 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Which regions have you found to be most effected by smoke taint in 07 - have seen a few reviews recently on 07 Yarra Valley where you have mentioned it occurring. I am not always sure I am getting the truth when I ask at wineries in various Victorian wine regions whether their 07 wines were effected by smoke taint and they say they have not been.
April 23, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMF
I take every wine as it comes - some seem to have it and some don't, and I just take what the contents of the glass in front of me tell me. Everything north-east of - and including - the Yarra Valley is in the risk zone, but it's not certain until you try it. I'm talking Victoria here. And I'm saying up front that small amounts of smoke taint are no big deal, and can almost be a positive at times.
April 23, 2008 | Registered Commentercampbell mattinson
I've found most wineries to be mainly honest - so far. Some admit to smoke taint but omit a few things - like putting the wines through RO and carbon filtering - but why would they let on anyway. That really roots the wine and I'd rather have the taint! Then there are others who flat out lie about wines being tainted but a bit of sleuthing behind the scenes quickly smokes em out..so to speak. I reckon it's one of those things a bit like brett in that if you look for it you will probably convince yourself of finding it. I also think it won't trigger as strong an emotion in city people as country folk. It's when it goes acrid on the palate that it becomes a big problem. You'd have to think that most wine from 2007 Yarra, King Valley, Beechworth and Gippsland would have a bit of taint.
GW
April 24, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterGW

And as far as some Rutherglen wines I am told.

Nice call re: city folk versus country folk. The most negative comments I have had from people re: 2003 smoke-affected wines were from consumers who have lived through a bushfire.
April 25, 2008 | Registered Commentercampbell mattinson
What about Goulburn. I'm tasting a 2007 white from Goulburn at present and it tastes more than a little smoky and ashy...
GW
April 25, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterGW

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.